Reported issues for Leteo
Pod holds 10 of 10 problems reported by people outside the maintainer team. Issues filed by the project's own owners, members and collaborators are excluded entirely — a maintainer's release checklist is not a warning to a prospective user.
Back to Leteo.
Most discussed
The container image is amd64 only, so Apple Silicon runs it emulated
ghcr.io/asanabrial/leteo ships one architecture. The release workflow's build step passes no platforms:, so it builds whatever the runner is — linux/amd64 — and the package page shows exactly that.
Anyone on an Apple Silicon Mac who runs docker pull ghcr.io/asanabrial/leteo gets the amd64 image under emulation. It works, and it is slower for no reason a user can see.
What it takes
In .github/workflows/release.yml, the `docker/build-p
Read the thread · 2026-08-11 · closed · 40 comments
ci/cloud-and-container-jobs-not-required: The two jobs guarding the worst regressions cannot block a merge
Description for dumb humans
[!NOTE] Las pruebas que cubren lo más delicado de Leteo — aislamiento entre inquilinos, permisos, revocación de credenciales — pueden fallar sin impedir que un cambio se fusione. Solo las pruebas unitarias bloquean.
Problem
main requires four status checks, all of them unit-tests matrix legs:
Unit Tests (ubuntu-latest)
Unit Tests (ubuntu-22.04-arm)
Unit Tests (macos-latest)
Unit Tests (windows-latest)
Cloud Tests and Container Images
Read the thread · 2026-08-24 · closed · 18 comments
mcp/tools-list-omits-cache-fields-on-2026-07-28: The server accepts a protocol revision it does not finish, and ZCode gets no tools at all
Description for dumb humans
[!NOTE] Leteo le dice a ZCode que habla una versión nueva del protocolo y luego no cumple una parte de ella, así que ZCode rechaza la lista de herramientas y el usuario se queda sin memoria: ninguna herramienta aparece, sin que nada explique por qué.
Problem
Leteo's MCP server accepts protocol revision 2026-07-28 and then answers tools/list without two
fields that revision requires. A client that speaks it gets zero tools.
Measured against the in
Read the thread · 2026-08-27 · closed · 14 comments
docs/token-article-attributes-its-largest-cost-away: docs/token-article-attributes-its-largest-cost-away: Two sentences that sell better than the data allows
Description for dumb humans
[!NOTE] El artículo que acabamos de publicar tiene dos frases que se venden mejor de lo que el dato aguanta: una saca del debe de Leteo el 78 % de lo que cuesta, y la otra da un resultado sin decir que se apoya en una ejecución que el propio artículo aparta. Ninguna cifra está mal; las dos frases sí.
Problem
Two findings from the round-3 blind panel on #65, each confirmed independently by both judges, recorded against receipt `2a6dec26c01ae69a36b283b7
Read the thread · 2026-08-25 · closed · 7 comments
doctor/no-check-compares-a-memory-against-the-code: doctor/no-check-compares-a-memory-against-the-code: The review window is a calendar, and age was never what made a memory wrong
Description for dumb humans
[!NOTE] Una memoria puede envejecer sin que nada se entere: el fichero que cita se mueve, el módulo se parte en dos, y la nota sigue apuntando donde ya no hay nada. Hoy nadie lo comprueba, y
leteo doctorpasará a decirlo — con cuidado de no dar por muerto lo que solo está escrito de otra forma.
Problem
A memory's review window is a calendar. It fires on age, and age was never what made a memory wrong — the world moving underneath it was. Nothing in
Read the thread · 2026-08-25 · closed · 1 comment
Setup knows six agents and Command Code is a seventh
src/setup/ knows six agents — claude-code, codex, cursor, gemini-cli, opencode,
windsurf — and plugin/ ships a plugin for three of them. Command Code is a seventh CLI coding
agent (npm i -g command-code, https://commandcode.ai), now installed and in use on the author's
machine, and Leteo knows nothing about it.
So a session there starts with no memory: no MCP registration, no agent file, no plugin. The tool whose whole point is that context survives the session is the one thin
Read the thread · 2026-08-22 · open · 1 comment
The repository root is 34 entries, and the README starts below all of them
GitHub lists every root entry before it renders the README, so the number of entries is the amount of scrolling between arriving and reading the first sentence. There are 34.
What is actually movable
Measured by grepping for every reference, not by looking at the names.
| why it stays | |
|---|---|
install.sh, install.ps1 |
raw.githubusercontent.com/.../main/install.sh appears in the README, the npm README, both plugin READMEs, the README crates.io renders, and anywhere any |
Read the thread · 2026-08-12 · closed · 0 comments
leteo setup, run from the npm wrapper, writes a path that will disappear
What happens
setup resolves the command it writes with env::current_exe() (src/setup/mod.rs:765). Run through the npm wrapper, that is the binary inside the package's own cache. Measured in a container:
"command": "/home/u/npm/vendor/v0.1.1-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-leteo"
For an npx user the equivalent path lives under ~/.npm/_npx/<hash>/node_modules/@asanabrial/leteo/vendor/, and it goes away on npm cache clean, when npx evicts the entry, or when the version change
Read the thread · 2026-08-12 · closed · 0 comments
Most recent
The released Linux binary needs GLIBC 2.38, so it does not start on Debian 12 or Ubuntu 22.04
What happens
The x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu release archive extracts fine and then refuses to run:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by leteo)
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.39' not found (required by leteo)
Measured against node:22-bookworm-slim (Debian 12, glibc 2.36). The same archive runs correctly on node:22-trixie-slim (Debian 13, glibc 2.41): leteo 0.1.0, exit 0.
Why
.github/workflows/release.yml builds
Read the thread · 2026-08-12 · closed · 0 comments
The version is written in three places and nothing ties them together
0.1.0 is written by hand in three places:
Cargo.toml,version— the one that decides what is published to crates.io;server.json,versionat the top level;server.jsonagain,packages[0].version.
Nothing reads server.json from CI, from a test, or from the crate. Grep for it: the only hits are the README and glama.json.
So the next release goes like this. Cargo.toml becomes 0.2.0, cargo publish puts 0.2.0 on crates.io, and server.json
Read the thread · 2026-08-11 · closed · 0 comments
The remaining reports are on the project's issue tracker.