Reported issues for mcp-for-api
Pod holds 9 of 9 problems reported by people outside the maintainer team. Issues filed by the project's own owners, members and collaborators are excluded entirely — a maintainer's release checklist is not a warning to a prospective user.
Back to mcp-for-api.
Most discussed
🚀 Enhancement: Please reduce the number of tools
🔖 Enhancement description
The number of Appwrite MCP tools should be reduced for better compatibility
🎤 Pitch
Cursor has 40 MCP tools limit to use, but Appwrite solely has 195 tools, so it cannot be used with other tools nor even all of Appwrite tools. Is there any plan to reduce(integrate) the number of tools so that can be harmonized with other MCP tools?
👀 Have you spent some time to che
Read the thread · 2025-04-21 · closed · external user · 7 comments
🐛 Bug Report: Can't install MCP server
👟 Reproduction steps
When I follow the steps to install the Appwrite MCP server, nothing happens. Unfortunately, I can't seem to install the MCP server easily.
👍 Expected behavior
I hope someone can help me with this issue.
👎 Actual Behavior
However, when using the MCP with my API key and project ID, I get no response. It seems like the MCP code is incomplete because none of the tools appear as shown in your YouTube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83rNS6W2Nu8
I've inst
Read the thread · 2025-03-19 · closed · external user · 4 comments
Consider MCP ToolAnnotations on the 4 public tools (proposal + draft PR ready)
Background
The MCP 2025-06-18 spec defines optional ToolAnnotations on every
public tool (title, readOnlyHint, destructiveHint,
idempotentHint, openWorldHint). Leaving a hint unset signals
"unknown" to MCP clients, which forces them to be conservative —
typically prompting the user before executing the tool.
mcp-server-appwrite exposes 4 public tools via
Operator.get_public_tools() (registered through
server.handle_list_tools):
| Tool | Behavior
Read the thread · 2026-07-27 · open · external user · 2 comments
Docs: Update MCP configuration schema for Google Antigravity
💭 Description
Description The current setup instructions for the Appwrite MCP servers lead to validation errors when implemented in Google Antigravity. Specifically, the IDE fails to recognize the servers when using the 'servers' root key and the 'url' field for the documentation server.
Observed Issues 1. Root Key Conflict: Using 'servers' as the root key often results in the IDE showing "No MCP servers installed." 2. Schema Validation Error: For the 'appwrite-docs' server
Read the thread · 2025-12-22 · closed · external user · 2 comments
🐛 Bug Report: Unable to set permissions
👟 Reproduction steps
When using the Appwrite MCP tools in Cursor, it's not possible to set permissions on collections or documents using the standard Appwrite permissions format.
The following MCP tools that accept permissions parameters all fail:
mcp_appwrite_databases_create_collection(shown asdatabases_create_collection)mcp_appwrite_databases_update_collection(shown asdatabases_update_collection)mcp_appwrite_databases_create_document(shown as `databases_create_doc
Read the thread · 2025-03-19 · closed · external user · 2 comments
Self-hosted: Database model validation fails on missing policies/archives fields
Description
The mcp-server-appwrite package (v0.8.1) depends on the appwrite Python SDK 21.0.0+, whose Database Pydantic model requires policies (List[BackupPolicy]) and archives (List[BackupArchive]) as mandatory fields. Self-hosted Appwrite instances (including the latest stable v1.9.5) do not return these Cloud-only fields in the database list response (GET /tablesdb).
Impact
The MCP server's startup validation (validate_services -> tables_db.list()) fails immediately
Read the thread · 2026-06-30 · open · external user · 1 comment
🚀 Enhancement: vscode integration?
🔖 Enhancement description
vscode now has MCP support. vscode integration would not be a bad idea on top of that, the integration wouldn't be wildly different from cursors' due to their similar codebase architectures.
🎤 Pitch
Most people in my circle use vscode. And extrapolating that, I assume almost all devs use or have used vscode, making this a very useful feature.
👀 Have you spent some time to check if this issue has been raised before?
- I checked and didn't find simila
Read the thread · 2025-07-10 · closed · outside contributor · 1 comment
🚀 Enhancement: Will MCPs eventually support the Website APIs?
🔖 Enhancement description
It would be nice for MCPs to support websites.
🎤 Pitch
One can try to automate the process of spinning up a quick site via an LLM prompt.
👀 Have you spent some time to check if this issue has been raised before?
- I checked and didn't find similar issue
🏢 Have you read the Code of Conduct?
- I have read the Code of Conduct
Read the thread · 2025-06-24 · closed · external user · 1 comment
Most recent
MCP server listed on ATX - claim or correct the record
Hi - I run ATX, an independent registry that records evidence about publicly reachable MCP servers. This server is listed:
Nothing is needed from you. Flagging it in case you'd like to correct anything, or claim the domain to get a verified-operator badge and trigger rescans after a change - one DNS TXT record, no account.
Collection is unauthenticated initialize + tools/list only, no tool is ever
invoked, robots.txt is honoured,
Read the thread · 2026-08-25 · open · external user · 0 comments
The remaining reports are on the project's issue tracker.