Pod

Yes, this is on purpose. Pod is built for agents, so the default page is plain HTML.
Human? View the normal website.
Agent? You probably prefer /mcp/inspectrum/issues.md or /mcp/inspectrum/issues.json, or Pod over MCP.

Reported issues for Inspectrum

Pod holds 6 of 6 problems reported by people outside the maintainer team. Issues filed by the project's own owners, members and collaborators are excluded entirely — a maintainer's release checklist is not a warning to a prospective user.

Back to Inspectrum.

Most discussed

Bug: invalid config crashes the MCP server with a raw ZodError; MCPB manifest pins an exact npm version

Summary

In the Claude Desktop app, the Inspectrum MCP server fails to start and the app shows only two generic banners — MCP Inspectrum: Server disconnected and Could not attach to MCP server Inspectrum. The developer settings pane marks the server failed with Erreur: Server disconnected and no further detail.

The banners are a symptom, not the cause. The MCP host log shows the server process dying immediately on startup with an unhandled ZodError from config parsing. Nothing

Read the thread · 2026-08-03 · closed · 3 comments

doctor: warn when an installed MCPB bundle is older than the running package

Split out of #67, where the reported "MCPB pins an exact npm version" defect turned out to be stale (see #68 for the evidence: the packaging script has shipped a self-contained bundle since #29, locked by tests/contract/distribution.contract.test.ts).

The residual gap

An MCPB bundle that was already installed stays at its build-time version forever, with no signal anywhere. That is how a 0.1.1 bundle survived until it crashed on a config that 0.2.3 accepts. Reinstalling is the only fix, a

Read the thread · 2026-08-03 · open · 1 comment

Story: Expose reviewed, partial, and unreviewed coverage with reviewer counts

Parent Feature: #61 Parent Outcome: #59

User story

As a developer approving a risky agent plan, I want the result to state exactly how much requested review happened so that plan quality and reviewer availability cannot be confused.

Acceptance criteria

Read the thread · 2026-08-02 · open · 0 comments

Feature: Honest review coverage in every review_plan result

Parent Outcome: #59

Expected result

Every review_plan response separates plan-content verdict from reviewer coverage. A reviewer failure is never hidden behind an unqualified approve.

Scope

Out of scope

Fallback routing, per

Read the thread · 2026-08-02 · open · 0 comments

Generate mcpb manifest version from package.json + release version-consistency test

From the Codex GPT-5.6 week review (findings DXR-3, TEST-3). 0.2.0 is aligned today across package.json / plugin.json / manifest.json / src/version.ts, so this bites the NEXT version bump, not this release.

Read the thread · 2026-07-12 · closed · 0 comments

Harden the plan-gate plugin shim (version drift, npx-failure fail-open)

From the Codex GPT-5.6 week review (findings SEC-6, DXR-1, DXR-2). Deferred from the pre-0.2.0 hardening PR because the shim is shipped in the plugin and pinning needs 0.2.0 on npm first.

`scripts/plan-gate-shim.sh`:

Read the thread · 2026-07-12 · closed · 0 comments

Most recent

The remaining reports are on the project's issue tracker.