Pod

Yes, this is on purpose. Pod is built for agents, so the default page is plain HTML.
Human? View the normal website.
Agent? You probably prefer /mcp/splitwise-mcp/issues.md or /mcp/splitwise-mcp/issues.json, or Pod over MCP.

Reported issues for splitwise-mcp

Pod holds 10 of 10 problems reported by people outside the maintainer team. Issues filed by the project's own owners, members and collaborators are excluded entirely — a maintainer's release checklist is not a warning to a prospective user.

Back to splitwise-mcp.

Most discussed

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #145: ci: typecheck in the test script, so CI actually checks types

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #145 (verdict: warn).

🟡 Nits


Checklist regenerated from the auto-review of 4da4713 (run). Ticks survive later rounds, but a round that reviewed an older commit can still re-list something already fixed — che

Read the thread · 2026-08-26 · closed · outside contributor · 0 comments

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #142: chore: declare a mint.yaml hosting manifest

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #142 (verdict: fail).

🔴 Important


Checklist regenerated from the auto-review of 743742a (run). Ticks survive later rounds, but a round that reviewed an older commit can still re-list something alr

Read the thread · 2026-08-25 · closed · outside contributor · 0 comments

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #138: fix(receipts): name every blocker, suggest only the routes still open

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #138 (verdict: fail).

🔴 Important


Checklist regenerated from the auto-review of 5332f52 (run). Ticks survive later rounds, but a round

Read the thread · 2026-08-22 · closed · outside contributor · 1 comment

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #136: fix(receipts): trust magic bytes over Content-Type, and name the real blocker

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #136 (verdict: pass).

🟡 Nits


Checklist regenerated from the auto-review of 666677f (run). Ticks survi

Read the thread · 2026-08-22 · closed · outside contributor · 0 comments

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #133: fix(receipts): return receipt content to the caller, not just a server path

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #133 (verdict: warn).

🟡 Nits

Read the thread · 2026-08-22 · closed · outside contributor · 0 comments

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #129: feat: add sw_get_receipt for authenticated receipt downloads

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #129 (verdict: warn).

🟡 Nits

Read the thread · 2026-08-22 · closed · outside contributor · 0 comments

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #109: ci: convert to chrischall/workflows reusable pipeline

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #109 (verdict: fail).

🔴 Important


When addressing the review on #109, resolve each item and add Closes #<this issue> to the PR once everything is genuinely fixed; deferred items stay open here. See the auto-re

Read the thread · 2026-07-27 · closed · outside contributor · 1 comment

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #83: refactor: pass client into tool registrars (transport-neutral)

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #83 (verdict: warn).

🟡 Nits


When addressing the review on #83, resolve each item and add Closes #<this issue> to the PR once everything is genuinely fixed; deferred items stay open here.

Read the thread · 2026-07-14 · closed · outside contributor · 1 comment

Most recent

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #155: feat: add sw_healthcheck

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #155 (verdict: warn).

🟡 Nits

Read the thread · 2026-08-30 · closed · outside contributor · 0 comments

Auto-review follow-ups for PR #96: ci: deploy the connector Worker on release

Tracking auto-review follow-ups for #96 (verdict: warn).

🟡 Nits


When addressing the review on #96, resolve each item and add Closes #<this issue> to the PR once everything is genuinely fixed; deferred items stay open he

Read the thread · 2026-07-20 · closed · outside contributor · 0 comments

The remaining reports are on the project's issue tracker.