Pod

Yes, this is on purpose. Pod is built for agents, so the default page is plain HTML.
Human? View the normal website.
Agent? You probably prefer /mcp/thread-keeper/issues.md or /mcp/thread-keeper/issues.json, or Pod over MCP.

Reported issues for thread-keeper

Pod holds 22 of 39 problems reported by people outside the maintainer team. Issues filed by the project's own owners, members and collaborators are excluded entirely — a maintainer's release checklist is not a warning to a prospective user.

Back to thread-keeper.

Most discussed

Recoverable lesson removal (soft-delete/tombstone) before curator destructive-by-default prunes unrecoverably

Problem

Lesson removal is irreversible, and the curator is moving to destructive-by-default, so a wrongly-pruned lesson is silently lost with no recovery path.

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 5 comments

Security: de-privilege & sanitize autonomous GitHub-writing daemons (bypassPermissions, prompt injection, body redaction)

Problem

thread-keeper's autonomous daemons can write to a public GitHub repo and run an unsandboxed code agent, and the only barrier protecting that surface is a single prompt-level instruction. Three coupled weaknesses:

  1. Output side — no mechanical redaction. The evolve reviewer (threadkeeper/evolve_daemon.py:216-230) and the evolve appliers (threadkeeper/evolve_applier.py roadmap-issue path ~:859, evolve-format path ~:1056) run permission_mode="bypassPermissions" with `Bas

Read the thread · 2026-06-14 · closed · 4 comments

Cross-CLI ingest verification in production

Status

Cross-CLI ingest is wired (see `scripts/tk_verify_ingest.py` for the contract test) but has only been exercised on a single dev machine. Need real-world verification across all four CLIs.

What's needed

Read the thread · 2026-05-14 · closed · 4 comments

Bug: CLI MCP/hook config writes are non-atomic full-file rewrites — a crash or concurrent write can truncate ~/.claude.json (entire Claude Code state)

Problem

Every adapter and the installer mutate CLI config with the pattern cfg = json.loads(path.read_text()) then path.write_text(json.dumps(cfg)) — a truncate-then-write with no temp-file + os.replace atomic swap (e.g. threadkeeper/adapters/claude_code.py:146,159; threadkeeper/adapters/gemini.py; threadkeeper/adapters/copilot.py; the hook helper; threadkeeper/_setup.py instruction writes).

Two failure modes:

  1. Crash/partial write → corruption. write_text truncates th

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 3 comments

Add retention/GC for the tasks table and TASK_LOG_DIR spool files (unbounded growth + sensitive prompt/log persistence)

Problem

The tasks table and the TASK_LOG_DIR spool directory grow without bound — nothing ever prunes either.

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 3 comments

Curator destructive-by-default: pre-mutation snapshot/restore + structured prune/consolidate telemetry

Problem

THREADKEEPER_CURATOR_DESTRUCTIVE now defaults to 1 (CHANGELOG [Unreleased]; config.py curator_destructive: bool = True). Once the curator daemon is enabled, the spawned LLM child writes REPORT-<isodate>.md and then applies its own PRUNE / CONSOLIDATE / PATCH directly via lesson_remove and skill_manage(action='delete') — autonomously, no human review.

The destruction has no recovery path:

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 3 comments

Telemetry dashboard for shadow_review production validation

Goal

Once `MEMORY_PARTNER_SHADOW_REVIEW_INTERVAL_S` is enabled in production (15min default), we need visibility into:

Surfac

Read the thread · 2026-05-14 · closed · 3 comments

Lessons: add surgical lesson_patch and same-slug shadow edit exemption

Problem

lesson_append() only supports wholesale same-slug overwrite, and shadow-authored lessons still hit the word-count cap. That leaves older long lessons effectively frozen: a one-line correction forces a full re-transcription, but the long-body guard blocks the only existing in-place edit path.

Proposed direction

Add a surgical lesson_patch(slug, old_string, new_string) tool, mirroring skill_manage(action='patch'), and allow same-slug overwrites that do not grow the lesson body

Read the thread · 2026-06-20 · closed · 2 comments

Most recent

Security: split Curator web research from destructive memory mutation

Problem

A destructive Curator child is currently granted both untrusted web-research capabilities (WebSearch and WebFetch) and tools that patch or delete durable lessons, skills, and concepts. The prompt also requires external research for every skill. Snapshot recovery and per-pass mutation caps limit damage, but they do not prevent web content from steering mutations inside the same model context.

Issue #79 established this separation for the Evolve reviewer, but the equivalent Curato

Read the thread · 2026-08-24 · open · 0 comments

Port ThreadKeeper to MCP SDK 2.x before lifting the compatibility cap

Problem

The package currently pins mcp>=1.10.0,<2 because MCP SDK 2.0 removed the mcp.server.fastmcp import path and renamed FastMCP to MCPServer. Before the cap was added, fresh installs could resolve 2.0 and fail at import time.

The compatibility cap restores installations, but the codebase still imports the 1.x API directly in the MCP singleton, elicitation helper, and dialectic tool. The changelog explicitly says the 2.x port remains open, yet no roadmap issue tracks the migrati

Read the thread · 2026-08-10 · open · 0 comments

Security: untrusted GitHub comments can spoof Evolve applier claims

Problem

The Evolve applier treats any issue comment containing <!-- thread-keeper:evolve-applier-claim --> as an active claim for 24 hours. _issue_comment_is_active_claim checks only the marker and timestamp; _fetch_issue_comments does not preserve or validate the comment author's association or login.

Because the repository is public, an unrelated commenter can copy the visible marker into a comment on a trusted roadmap issue. The automatic applier then skips that issue until the cla

Read the thread · 2026-08-10 · open · 0 comments

Learning-loop skills: no load-time re-screen for loop-authored SKILL.md after write-time gate

Problem

Issue #76 added a write-time injection screen (review_prompts.screen_injection_markers, wired into lesson_append in threadkeeper/tools/lessons.py) so loop-synthesized memory can't carry imperative-override / remote-exec idioms at the moment it's created. That screen only runs once, at the lesson_append / skill_manage(create/patch) call site.

Once a SKILL.md is materialized under a loop-authored created_by_origin (shadow_review, candidate_review, background_review, etc.)

Read the thread · 2026-07-31 · open · outside contributor · 0 comments

Security: mechanically confine evolve web-research writes to the assigned digest

Problem

The evolve web-research phase is intentionally separated from the privileged audit phase, but it still receives a generic file-write capability. The single-digest write restriction exists only in prompt text, not as an enforced destination policy. Untrusted web content can therefore try to steer the research worker into altering repository or state files, creating an integrity and availability bridge into the later privileged audit.

Proposed direction

Replace generic research-phas

Read the thread · 2026-07-25 · open · 0 comments

Security: curator-report applier executes any REPORT-*.md as instructions with destructive memory tools — no provenance link to the curator pass that wrote it

Problem

apply_curator_report (threadkeeper/evolve_applier.py:1353) consumes a curator report selected purely by filesystem state: _latest_complete_curator_report globs CURATOR_REPORTS_DIR.glob("REPORT-*.md"), sorts by mtime, and accepts the newest file that contains the completeness marker CURATOR_PASS_COMPLETE (CURATOR_REPORT_MARKER, line 140) and is not yet recorded as applied (threadkeeper/evolve_applier.py:521-541). It then reads the report's full text, inlines it into the

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 2 comments

Bug: memory/skill nudge counters inflated by daemon *_pass and render_brief's own *_hint_shown events — nudges fire early

Problem

nudges._count_events_since (threadkeeper/nudges.py:92-118) counts every events row for the session with id > since_id, excluding only _NONCOUNTING_KINDS = ("thread_hint_shown","shadow_review_pass") plus the caller's reset kinds. But background daemons write per-tick *_pass events under the foreground session id (identity._session_id):

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 2 comments

Security/data-loss: destructive curator's PROTECTED guarantee is prompt-only — foreground lessons never classified protected; skill_manage(delete) has no provenance/tier guard

Problem

The curator now runs destructive-by-default (THREADKEEPER_CURATOR_DESTRUCTIVE=1, shipped in e4c4dcf): after writing its REPORT, the spawned child autonomously applies PRUNE/CONSOLIDATE via lesson_remove and skill_manage(action='delete') (threadkeeper/curator.py:467-494). The prompt claims two safety nets, but neither is enforced at the server layer for the entries they are meant to protect.

Lessons — the protected class is unreachable. Both the [PROTECTED] in

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 1 comment

Curator destructive-by-default: [PROTECTED] invariant is prompt-only for skill patch/delete & lesson force-remove — enforce server-side

Problem

Flipping the curator to destructive-by-default (THREADKEEPER_CURATOR_DESTRUCTIVE now defaults to 1, branch merge/curator-to-main) hands the autonomous curator child a write toolset (lesson_append, lesson_remove, skill_manage) under permission_mode="auto". The curator marks user/pinned/foreground entries [PROTECTED] in the inventory and the prompt says "NEVER touch [PROTECTED]" / "NEVER pass force=True". But that contract is only partially backed by server-side

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 1 comment

Hot-config reload is Claude-Code-only: config_watcher hardcodes ~/.claude/settings.json, no-ops on Codex/Gemini/Antigravity/VS Code hosts

Problem

Hot-config reload (#2, shipped) lets the running MCP server pick up edited THREADKEEPER_* env knobs without a host restart. But threadkeeper/config_watcher.py resolves the watched file as a hardcoded ~/.claude/settings.json (_settings_path()), with only a single global THREADKEEPER_CONFIG_WATCH_PATH override.

thread-keeper ships adapters for several hosts, and each stores its MCP-server env in a different file and format:

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 1 comment

Dockerfile installs threadkeeper unpinned — non-reproducible Glama eval build

Problem

Dockerfile:13 installs the package unpinned:

RUN pip install --no-cache-dir threadkeeper

The image is the artifact Glama builds to compute the MCP Quality score (it speaks MCP over stdio and inspects the tool schema — see the Dockerfile header and glama.json). An unpinned install means every rebuild silently pulls whatever threadkeeper (and transitive mcp / pydantic / pyyaml) is newest on PyPI, so:

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 1 comment

Adapter MCP-config writes are non-atomic + lock-free — interrupted/concurrent write can corrupt the host CLI's whole config (e.g. ~/.claude.json)

Problem

Every CLI adapter writes the host CLI's own config file via a plain, non-atomic write_text(json.dumps(...)) after a read-modify-write. Examples:

Two fa

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 1 comment

Privacy: selective erasure ("forget this session/topic") — no way to delete one conversation from dialog + derived stores short of rm-ing the whole DB

Problem

thread-keeper auto-ingests transcripts from all connected CLIs by default and fans them out into many derived stores: dialog_messages (+ FTS5 + dialog_vec), notes / notes_vec, the lessons.md store, dialectic observations/claims, verbatim, materialized skills, and per-task log files under TASK_LOG_DIR.

The only documented way to remove sensitive content — e.g. a session where credentials, a client's confidential data, or a regretted exchange were discussed — is the RE

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 1 comment

Candidate-reviewer 'max 2 new skills per pass' cap is prompt-only — enforce server-side in skill_manage

Problem

threadkeeper/candidate_reviewer.py:122-123 states the "max 2 new skills per pass" cap only in the LLM prompt, and skill_manage(action='create') is in the child's extra_allowed_tools (lines 368-376) with no per-pass create counter or server-side gate (no LIMIT check in tools/skills.py). The reviewer child's input is harvested user/agent dialog content, so it is prompt-injection-exposed; a confused or injected child can call create N times and pollute the auto-trigger skill

Read the thread · 2026-06-17 · closed · 1 comment

The remaining reports are on the project's issue tracker.